A coalition of Yakima Valley voters says the redrawn 15th Legislative District dilutes Latino voter strength by excluding key Latino communities.
By Mai Hoang, Crosscut
A coalition of Latino voters filed a lawsuit Wednesday against Washington’s bipartisan Redistricting Commission, saying the new political maps continue the long-standing disenfranchisement of minority voters in Yakima County.
The coalition said the recently redrawn legislative district maps create a “facade” of a majority Latino voter district by diluting voter strength and violating federal voting rights laws.
The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in the Western District of Washington in Seattle on behalf of several Yakima Valley residents and the Southcentral Coalition of People of Color for Redistricting. The nonprofit organization’s members include several Yakima County Latino voters who have been involved in other voting rights cases in the region.
The bipartisan state Redistricting Commission is tasked with redrawing political districts once a decade to reflect changes in population, incorporating the latest data from the U.S. census.
The lawsuit claims the redistricting plans for the Washington legislative districts offer a “facade of a Latino opportunity district.” That’s because while the percentage of Latino voters — 50.02% — meets the majority standards for the 15th Legislative District, the commission’s approved map is drawn in a way that dilutes Latino voting power.
The lawsuit takes issue with the commission’s move to exclude adjacent and heavily Latino communities in Yakima County from the 15th District and instead includes more rural white communities from Benton, Grant and Franklin counties.
The suit claims the district is drawn to increase the voting strength of white voters, who tend to vote against candidates preferred by Latino voters. While the district has a slight majority of Latino voters, it excludes a politically cohesive group of Latino voters in areas such as Toppenish and Wapato for places like Othello, which includes fewer politically active Latino voters.
“I think the very simple issue is that Latino communities don’t have a decisive voice when it comes to their elected officials,” said David Morales, a Yakima attorney and treasurer of the Southcentral Coalition of People of Color for Redistricting. “That is a basic problem of democracy.”
Lisa McLean, executive director of the Redistricting Commission, said the commission had no comment due to ongoing litigation. A spokesman said Commissioner Paul Graves does not comment on pending litigation. Commissioners April Sims, Brady Piñero Walkinshaw and Joe Fain did not respond to requests for comment.
The lawsuit cited “reconstituted” elections results showing that Latino voters in the redrawn 15th District would have been on the losing side in nearly all major elections, including the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
The lawsuit, citing several media stories, said the Redistricting Commission was amply warned that its efforts could violate voting rights laws. Among the reports cited was a Crosscut story regarding a UCLA Voting Rights Project analysis that showed none of the proposed maps adequately created a legislative district where most eligible voters are Latino.
“The Commission could have avoided creating a façade Latino opportunity district; alternative configurations are possible that have a higher [Latino voter] percentage, and reconstituted election results demonstrate that [Latino voters] would have a real opportunity to elect their candidates of choice in those configurations,” the plaintiffs wrote in the lawsuit.
Morales noted that his group and other organizations, such as the UCLA Voting Rights Project, submitted several maps that would have kept more Latino voter blocs together. The map that the commission came up with did not consider those proposals, Morales said.
“It’s very hard to look at the facts and come to any other conclusion than the conclusion we drew: that this is discriminatory,” he said.
The lawsuit stated that diluted Latino voting power in 15th District is the latest in a long history of voter disfranchisement and discrimination. It cited several examples of past disenfranchisement and voter discrimination, including a higher ballot rejection rate for Latino voters in Yakima County, which has made it difficult for Latino voters to fully engage in the political process and get elected.
“This is just the latest chapter in this long story,” Morales said.
The Yakima Valley has seen several voting rights lawsuits in the past. In 2014, a federal judge ruled that the city of Yakima’s system of electing council members by citywide vote disadvantaged Latinos, leading the city to shift to district-based elections. The council has since had several Latino and Latina council members.
Last year, Yakima County settled a voting rights case by agreeing to switch to a district-based voting system in the general election, previously done at-large countywide. The change will force the county’s commissioners to run for reelection later this year.
This is not the only lawsuit filed against the state over the latest redistricting process. Last month, the Washington Coalition for Open Government filed suit arguing the commission violated the state’s Open Public Meetings Act by conducting portions of the redistricting process out of the public eye.
This article was republished from Crosscut.com