Skip to content

Public, meet our friend, the PDC website

How you can use a RANGE reporter’s favorite tool to find all the juicy details during election season

Public, meet our friend, the PDC website
(Art by Valerie Osier)

During this year’s primary elections, then-auditor candidate Dale Whitaker paid nearly $13,000 to send hundreds of thousands of texts to Spokane County voters. One of his opponents, Spokane City Council Member Michael Cathcart, listed 75 pieces of rebar under campaign expenditures.

Sheriff John Nowels has raised nearly $60,000 this year to run his race — unopposed. 

Conservative megadonor Larry Stone gambled away over $100,000 of his manufacturing fortune by donating to a committee opposing the local transit authority’s tax renewal. It passed anyway.

Incumbent legislative candidate Natasha Hill spent $500 for the billboard design and social media campaign proclaiming she “has great jeans,” a spoof on the controversial ad from fellow Spokane blue-jean-wearer Sydney Sweeney. Meanwhile, her seatmate hopeful, Luc Jasmin III, spent $43.60 to buy 80 Pride flags from Amazon.com. 

Prosecutor candidate Preston McCollam shelled out $36.85 for legal pads and a new pen, and another $544.99 for a new laptop. State legislative candidate Jonathan Bingle spent $1,537.18 on “phone and phone accessories.”

Republican candidates held fundraising events at places like David’s Pizza and The Steam Plant, while Democrats chose Cascadia Public House and Jewel of the North. 

We found all this information without making a single phone call — and you can too! The Washington State Public Disclosure Commission’s website is a treasure trove of information for the morbidly nosy and the professionally probing alike. 

A candidate’s favorite caterer, what parades they marched in and who donates to their campaign can all be found by digging through the records filed to the PDC. 

If you want to learn to use the PDC like a journalist, read on. 

Candidate curiosities

To start your search, go to the “Candidates” page on the PDC. Once you’re here, you have your pick of the litter — you can look for a specific candidate you want the goss on, or you can filter by different categories, like every candidate running for a specific race, or every candidate of a certain party. For example, there are 74 independents running for state or local races in Washington this year, and three of them are local.  

Once you have chosen a specific candidate you want to dive deeper on, here are the kinds of things you can find about them:

The PDC also allows you to download most of their datasets, which empowers the most obsessive public information fangirl to do their own customized analyses. At RANGE, here are some of the things we look for when analyzing a candidate’s campaign contributions:

If you switch to the “Expenditures” tab on a candidate’s page, there’s even more to look at. You can see how much they’re paying their campaign managers, how much they’re spending on candy to hand out at parades (exactly $395.56 if you’re Cathcart), and how much they’re spending on printing and design services. Is their primary campaign strategy billboards? Yard signs? Sending thousands of targeted texts? You can answer all those questions by scrolling through a candidate’s expenditures list. 

Sometimes you spot interesting tidbits, like candidates using their funds for charitable giving: Incumbent Hill gave about $205 to the ACLU of Washington, described as “charity donation for campaign support,” while Bingle gave about one dollar more to the Spokane GOP, characterized as “charity.” 

If your candidate curiosity still isn’t sated, there are more places to dig. All candidates have to submit a filing form, which is typically linked in the overview section of the candidate profile. On the registration form, you can often find a candidate email, and contact information for their treasurer and campaign manager. If you have any additional questions about the candidate that the PDC can’t answer, those people usually can!

Peeping on the PACs

Your local candidate is going to appear on your ballot; your local political action committee is not. And yet, these committees often have an outsized influence on elections, pouring hundreds of thousands of dollars into funding candidate war chests, supporting or opposing ballot measures and running independent attack ads. You can peel back the curtains on their smoke-filled rooms by becoming a PDC wizard.

“Independent expenditure spending” can contain some of the most revealing tidbits . Some of the highest spending in local races often comes via these independent PAC expenditures — purchased, supposedly, without direct coordination with a campaign — instead of from the individual campaigns. 

If you’re getting 5 million annoying YouTube ads telling you to vote for someone and you want to know who to be annoyed with, first check a candidate’s regular expenditures. If you don’t see it there, it might lie within their independent expenditures, where you can see if a PAC or individual has spent independently to support or oppose that candidate. 

In this year’s local races, independent expenditures are currently under a grand, with just $735.65 logged — all from Fuse Votes WA committee. Some years, though, that spending goes crazy, like in 2023 when roughly $2 million in independent expenditure funds were spent in Spokane, or last year, when conservative PACs funneled nearly $100,000 into a city council candidate (he lost).

It’s a little tricky to know exactly which PACs are active in your area, but one trick is to go to the “committees” page, and filter by county and year. It isn’t a perfect method. If committees registered in different counties are spending in local elections, this won’t capture them. You can also check by jurisdiction or go granularly specific and search by candidate, though, and this will tell you any PAC influencing those races. 

While candidates have campaigns to donate to, ballot measures do not, which means that all spending to support or oppose ballot measures goes through PACs. You can usually find these by using the method above. They’ll be categorized as “Local Ballot Measure” committee, or sometimes a “Continuing Committee” if they support things like levies or bonds for a specific jurisdiction that run repeatedly. 

By looking at those PAC details, you can learn things like the Washington Trust Bank donated $50,000 to the committee in charge of running the transit tax renewal opposition campaign, while not a single contribution to the Yes for Buses PAC was over $10,000 — and most were under $5,000. 

Other things you can use the PDC for

You can do even more than just getting rote data on spending, contributions and independent expenditures using the PDC website. Here’s a list of examples of how we’ve used it to get your creative citizen journalist juices flowing: 

💡
Want EVEN MORE to sort through? You can look through and download the PDC’s open datasets here to find out even more things about local elections.

Erin Sellers

Erin moved here from ID to attend Gonzaga and fell in love with Spokane. They are a queer storyteller, and when they’re not pounding Red Bulls and typing frantically, you can find her on and off stage at local theatres. | erin(at)rangemedia.co

All articles

More in Election 2026

See all

More from Erin Sellers

See all